Look deeply into the eyes of a youth who did not receive a good education: they reflect a smouldering potential that never ignited by the spark of posing new questions and the excitement of discovering answers. Delve into the eyes of your students as you teach them and you will rediscover yourself as they discover themselves. Journey together on the path of learning and a better future will take shape.
63 percent of Pakistan's population is young. The majority has neither discovered its human potential due to low quality education (or none at all), nor can it participate in the process of the cultural, social and economic development of the country. Pakistan's elite based institutional structure by excluding the majority of a talented people from actualizing their potential and using it, is essentially constraining development: Economic and social inequality thus constitutes a fundamental fetter to development as much as to the building of a humane society.
It can be argued that inequality is built into the economic structure of many countries. After 300 years of growth under Capitalism, about half the world's population is living below the poverty line defined in terms of 2 dollars per person per day. The poor majority subsist in a world where a small minority lives in incredible luxury. In South Asia according to Dr Deepak Nayyar, in the period 1981 to 2005, although in percentage terms poverty has declined, yet the total number of poor has increased from 251 million to 496 million. In terms of a poverty line of 1.25 dollars per day, the percentage of the world's poor population that lives in South Asia has increased from 29 percent to 43 percent during the high growth period of 1981 to 2005.This suggests high levels of inequality. Indeed Palanivel and Unal at the UNDP in their recent paper provide evidence that the index of inequality in South Asia (called Geni Coefficient) has increased since the 1990s. It can be shown in fact that the higher the level of inequality, the lower the poverty reduction effect of economic growth. Thus the persistence of mass poverty inspite of high economic growth, at the global level as well as in South Asia, can to some extent be attributed to high levels of inequality.
The purpose of economic growth surely is not to enrich a few, while the majority suffer from social and economic deprivation. The fact of inequality also puts into question the humanity of the affluent who remain insensitive to the plight of the poor. As Jalaluddin Rumi the great Sufi poet said, those who have no empathy for the suffering of others, have no right to be called human.
The ability to love is what makes us human. Love is the path to God; it also links us with others, with nature and with our own nature. As Bulleh Shah said, "Demolish the temple, demolish the mosque demolish all that can be demolished, but do not injure the heart of man for that is the abode of God".
This ability to love which defines our sociality, induces a sense of responsibility towards others. Its practice is the emblem of our beauty, and sustains our dignity. As Rabia of Basra the great Sufi lady, wrote in the A.D. 8th Century: "Live with dignity, women, live with dignity, men. Few things will enhance our beauty as much".
The human quest of self realization requires the building of societies that are more equitable. For inequality in so far as it constrains the actualizing of the human potential, restricts human development. I have argued elsewhere that inequality by narrowing the base of investment and innovation, also restricts economic growth.
So we need to rethink growth and development, by turning narrow orthodox economics on its head. Building societies in which humans can bring into play their humanity must be the goal of economics. Both sustainable economic growth and development require creating the conditions for enabling all citizens rather than a few to fulfill their human potential.